Our 2018 budget not over bloated – Akwa Ibom Govt


The Akwa Ibom State Government says its 2018 budget is not “over bloated’’ as being speculated by Policy Alert, an NGO based in Uyo.

The Commissioner for Finance, Mr Linus Nkan, made this known in an interview with newsmen in Uyo on Wednesday.

According to the commissioner, the accusation is baseless and without facts.

Nkan said the proposals for it were anchored on estimates and not actual, which enabled the government to make adjustments.

He said that the allegation was misleading considering the current exchange rate of the country’s currency against the dollars.

The commissioner explained that the exchange rate was important in determining the size.

“While the 2017 budget was based on an exchange rate of N196 to a dollar, the 2018 budget is pegged on an exchange of N305 to a dollar.

“The NGO does not state the basis of its suggestion because the budget size of Akwa Ibom both 2017 and 2018 has different benchmarks.

“The benchmark of 2017 budget was based on the exchange rate of N196 to a dollar but this time around, we are talking about N305 per dollar. In Nigeria, everything is subjected to the dollar.

“If we actually want to compare the  size of last year and this year’s budget  in dollars, the 2018 own is smaller than that of 2017.’’

The commissioner explained that the debt inherited by the present government was not significant and borrowing money to fund development projects was not against any financial regulations.

“When such funds are deployed into the implementation of life touching projects, it will have multiplier effects on the economy. Refusal to borrow money will have negative impact on the economy.

“Borrowing on the other hand and investing in life changing projects, will guarantee economic growth when the funds are judiciously used,’’ he said.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the NGO in a statement described the 2018 budget proposal of N651.5 billion as over bloated in the history of the state.

The organisation demanded that it should be reduced because the performance of the capital budget in the past years had been unimpressive.